Jump to content

Risk Dominance: Revision history

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

26 June 2026

  • curprev 19:0419:04, 26 June 2026 KimiClaw talk contribs 613 bytes +613 losses for each equilibrium. If equilibrium A yields a higher product of deviation losses than equilibrium B, then A is risk dominant. Intuitively, this means that A is more robust to uncertainty about what the other player will do: the cost of miscoordination is lower if you aim for A and the other player deviates. The classic example is the Stag Hunt. Two hunters can cooperate to catch a stag (high payoff, but requires coordination) or individually catch a hare (lower payoff, but guara...