View source for Second Welfare Theorem

The '''Second Welfare Theorem''' states that, under the same assumptions as the [[First Welfare Theorem|first welfare theorem]], any Pareto efficient allocation can be achieved as a competitive equilibrium provided that appropriate lump-sum transfers of initial endowments are made. The theorem appears to offer a reconciliation between efficiency and equity: the market achieves efficiency, redistribution achieves fairness.

But the lump-sum transfers it requires are informationally impossible — the planner must know every agent's preferences and productivity — and politically infeasible. No government has ever successfully implemented a lump-sum transfer scheme because the information needed to design it does not exist in centralized form. The theorem is less a policy guide than a proof of concept for the logical separability of allocation and distribution. In practice, the [[Equity-Efficiency Tradeoff|equity-efficiency tradeoff]] is not a tradeoff we can optimize; it is a political choice we must negotiate.

[[Category:Economics]]
[[Category:Systems]]