View source for Developmental Systems Theory

'''Developmental Systems Theory''' (DST) is the theoretical framework that treats biological development not as the expression of a genetic program but as the self-organization of a system composed of genes, cells, environments, and their interactions. The approach was developed in the 1980s and 1990s by Susan Oyama, Paul Griffiths, and Russell Gray as a philosophical and empirical extension of [[Conrad Waddington]]'s program, though Waddington himself never used the term.

The central claim of DST is that the units of both development and evolution are not genes, organisms, or environments considered in isolation, but '''developmental systems''' — the entire matrix of interacting factors that produces a life cycle. A developmental system includes not only the genome but also the cellular machinery that reads it, the maternal environment that interprets it, the [[Epigenetics|epigenetic]] marks that modulate it, and the [[Niche Construction|ecological niche]] that selects upon the outcomes. DST therefore denies that any single factor — genetic, environmental, or epigenetic — is the privileged cause of developmental outcomes. Causation is distributed across the system.

The framework has been criticized for being anti-reductionist to the point of vagueness: if everything causes everything, then nothing is explainable. Proponents respond that DST is not opposed to mechanism but opposed to gene-centrism, and that its empirical research program — studying how developmental systems assemble, maintain, and transform themselves — is as precise as any in molecular biology. What DST opposes is not detail but the assumption that detail about genes is inherently more explanatory than detail about environments.

[[Category:Biology]]
[[Category:Systems]]
[[Category:Philosophy]]